Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666625›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Machine learning prediction of coal workers' pneumoconiosis classification based on few-shot clinical data.

Jiaqi Jia, Jingying Huang, Yuming Cui, Dekun Zhang, Haiquan Li, Songquan Wang, Wenlu Hang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiaqi JiaSchool of Mechatronic Engineering, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7412-219X
Jingying HuangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0147-6266
Yuming CuiSchool of Mechatronic Engineering, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5648-1825
Dekun ZhangSchool of Materials Science and Physics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-8598
Haiquan LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Songquan WangSchool of Mechatronic Engineering, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5463-2263
Wenlu HangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1083-2394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Aiming at the problems of the long incubation period, insufficient early diagnosis, and lack of treatment methods of coal workers' pneumoconiosis (CWP), the objective of this study is to accurately predict the CWP staging based on machine learning (ML) methods and small-sample clinical data. Methods: The study included a comparative analysis of clinical data from 202 healthy individuals and 81 CWP patients at general Hospital of Xuzhou Mining Group. Firstly, various oversampling techniques were employed to address the issue of data imbalance. Subsequently, multiple ML methods were adopted for supervised learning and prediction of CWP staging. Then, an innovative feature selection method was proposed, integrating the importance and independence of clinical features to achieve high-precision predictions of CWP with a limited number of indicators. Results: The study identified ALB, PLT, and WBC as significant predictive factors for CWP through the Random Forest importance assessment method. Furthermore, in terms of integrated feature selection, when the weight ratio of feature importance to independence was 7:3 or 6:4, all ML models showed optimal performance, with the Random Forest (RF)-Adaboost model demonstrating the best predictive accuracy for CWP, reaching a F1 score of 0.8757. Conclusions: The integration of clinical biochemical examination data with ML models, especially the RF-Adaboost and support vector machine-particle swarm optimization models, effectively predicted the staging of CWP. The proposed integrated feature selection method, which considered both the importance and independence of features, significantly enhanced model performance, providing a valuable tool for early screening and diagnosis of CWP.

Indexed as

clinical dataCoal workers’ pneumoconiosisfeature selectionmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40666625
PMCPMC12260318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.