ArticleDigital health
Predicting medication wastage using machine learning based on patient beliefs.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Medication wastage is a critical issue impacting the sustainability of subsidised healthcare systems in Southeast Asia due to financial and resource constraints. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict medication wastage by analysing patient demographics, health conditions and beliefs about medicines, using Malaysia as a case study. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted involving 734 patients across six public healthcare facilities in Malaysia. Data on demographics, medication history and beliefs about medicines were collected using validated questionnaires. Multiple ML regression models were evaluated to predict medication wastage, with performance assessed based on root mean squared error (RMSE). Results: The XGBoost model achieved the best performance with the lowest RMSE of 4.67, outperforming other models (RMSE range:4.68-5.10). It also performed best using only seven features selected by sequential backward elimination method using LR, making it practical for clinical implementation. Key predictors of medication wastage included beliefs about medicines, age, ethnicity, region and monthly income. Conclusion: This study is the first to apply ML to address medication wastage in a Southeast Asian context, filling a critical research gap. The proposed model provides a foundation for developing targeted interventions to reduce medication wastage and supports policymakers and healthcare providers in optimising the allocation of subsidised medications. The insights are broadly applicable to other countries with similar healthcare resource challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.