ArticleFrontiers in genome editing2025
Comprehensive approaches to design efficient gRNA for SDN1-CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in wheat.
Article in Frontiers in genome editing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient in-vitro regeneration and transformation for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing of phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene in pea (Pisum sativum L.).Plant cell reports · 2026Article
- AI-enhanced framework for optimizing CRISPR-Cas gene editing in crop biotechnology addressing regulatory challenges and opportunities in global agricultural practices.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: CRISPR/Cas9 technology has gained popularity due to its efficient, widely applicable, and relatively easy genome editing. Furthermore, the removal of regulation on site-directed nuclease1- (SDN1) and SDN2-developed products in many countries has made it a more revolutionary technology for adoption in crop improvement. Designing accurate guide RNA (gRNA) is the initial and most crucial step that decides the success of the editing. Although the gene editing technique is widely used in crops, a detailed and comprehensive method for designing efficient gRNA in wheat is still lacking. By virtue of wheat being a hexaploid crop and having a large genome size with repetitive DNA, a tailor-made strategy for designing the gRNA is crucial. Result: The manuscript explains the comprehensive strategies and methods for efficient gRNA designing by considering the physical and structural expression of the target gene in the genome and explains the on-target and off-target effects of gRNA for its precise editing through the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated SDN1 method of genome editing in wheat. Conclusion: The present manuscript is first of its kind to address the holistic approach, starting from efficient gene selection, gRNA designing, and post-gRNA designing issues like gRNA stability, binding efficiency, and functionality for SDN1-CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in wheat. This manuscript will be a ready reference for wheat researchers designing effective gRNA for wheat improvement to meet future food demand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.