Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666567›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Unifying NHS Electronic Prescribing and Health Records: Bridging the Digital Divide.

Hassan Ahmed, Syeda Aiman Rizvi

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hassan AhmedInternal Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King's Lynn, GBR.
Syeda Aiman RizviInternal Medicine, Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NHS is facing significant challenges in delivering safe, efficient, and high-quality care due to the fragmentation of patient information. A unified electronic health record (EHR) is essential to address several emerging issues, improve patient safety, and deliver better healthcare. Currently, healthcare professionals must navigate multiple systems to access vital patient data, which can lead to ambiguity, miscommunication, errors, and delays in healthcare provision. A single integrated system will enable real-time access to patient records, preventing misdiagnosis, reducing errors, and treatment delays, ultimately resulting in enhanced patient outcomes. Financially, a unified system would reduce software costs and duplicate investigations, resulting in cost savings that can be reinvested in other areas of healthcare. Moreover, the system would benefit medical research by enabling access to comprehensive patient data for tracking healthcare trends and focusing more on evidence-based practice. The NHS's centralized structure positions it well for system-wide implementation. Regional pilot projects demonstrate feasibility and offer a roadmap for national rollout. While challenges remain, including funding, training, and data privacy, the long-term benefits far outweigh them. A unified EHR system is a strategic necessity for a safer, more efficient, and equitable NHS.

Indexed as

economic efficiencyelectronic health record (ehr)national health servicesnhsunified health system

Identifiers

PMID40666567
PMCPMC12262002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.