Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666529›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

A paradigm shift in simulating affinity maturation to elicit broadly neutralizing antibodies.

Fahsai Nakarin, Kayla G Sprenger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fahsai NakarinBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States.
Kayla G SprengerDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) offer a promising route to protect against rapidly evolving pathogens such as HIV, influenza, and SARS-CoV-2, yet eliciting them through vaccination remains a significant challenge. A key to this problem lies in understanding antibody affinity maturation (AM), the evolutionary process within germinal centers (GCs) that shapes the B cell and thus antibody response. Traditionally, AM has been viewed as favoring the selection of B cells with the highest-affinity B cell receptors (BCRs) through competitive interplays. However, emerging evidence suggests that GCs are more permissive, allowing B cells with a broad range of affinities to persist, thereby promoting clonal diversity and enabling the rare emergence of bnAbs. This review reassesses affinity-based selection models and proposes a new paradigm that integrates multifactorial processes, including stochastic B cell decisions within GC dynamics, antigen extraction efficiency influenced by probabilistic bond rupture, and avidity-driven BCR binding alterations and representations on multivalent antigens. We highlight how advanced AM simulations that move beyond affinity as the sole determinant provide a more realistic and predictive representation of AM, marking a major step forward in developing strategies to promote effective immune responses against highly mutable, complex antigens.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntibody AffinityB-LymphocytesBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2AnimalsGerminal CenterHumansModels, ImmunologicalReceptors, Antigen, B-CellAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesReceptors, Antigen, B-Cellaffinity maturationB cellbroadly neutralizing antibodygerminal centersimulation

Identifiers

PMID40666529
PMCPMC12259674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.