ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Interpreting immune evasion: a novel assay for HLA loss detection.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents the analytical performance of a new Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) assay designed to detect Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) loss. Unlike existing methods, this assay offers increased sensitivity, broader applicability, and does not require prior knowledge of specific HLA mismatches, making it a more versatile tool for post-transplant monitoring. The main goal was to determine whether this assay can reliably identify HLA loss in post-transplant patients and provide clinically actionable information for relapse management. Furthermore, the clinical utility of the assay was assessed in patients undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) with haploidentical or HLA-mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD). The study included both artificial and clinical samples, which were analyzed using the present assay to examine insertion-deletion (indel) markers located within and adjacent to the HLA region. The results demonstrated that the new assay exhibits excellent correlation with the One Lambda Devyser Chimerism assay in samples without HLA loss, achieving a detection limit of 0.25%. Furthermore, the study showed that the markers employed in the assay can effectively identify the occurrence and location of HLA loss. These findings could potentially influence clinical decision-making, when the donor source of retransplants or Donor Lymphocyte Infusions (DLI) need to be re-considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.