ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Quantitative bead-based multiplex assay for simultaneous determination of IgG concentrations of pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, diphtheria, tetanus, Haemophilus influenzae b, and hepatitis B in human serum samples.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiplex serological assays provide opportunities for seroprevalence studies and for evaluating antibodies post-vaccination. In this report, we describe the development and validation of a seven-plex bead-based assay for quantifying human immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin (PRN), diphtheria toxoid (DT), tetanus toxoid (TT), Haemophilus influenzae b (Hib), and hepatitis B (Hep B) using international reference standards. Methods: Existing international human reference sera standards are tailored for monoplex assays and, therefore, require characterization for multiplex assays. The reference standards for pertussis (06/142), diphtheria (10/262), tetanus (13/240), Hib (09/222), and Hep B (07/164) were characterized for their suitability in the assay. The purified antigens (PT, FHA, PRN, DT, TT, Hib, and Hep B) were coupled to spectrally unique magnetic carboxylated beads. The method was validated according to the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and International Council for Harmonization Multidisciplinary (ICH M10) guidelines. Validation parameters, such as precision, accuracy, dilution linearity, assay range, robustness, and solution stability, were assessed. Results: An equi-mix of an international reference standard for Hep B (07/164) and Hib (09/222) provided the best dynamic range for the seven-plex assay. Method validation was conducted using a panel of human serum samples that included samples from vaccinated healthy volunteers, non-vaccinated volunteers, negative controls, and international reference standards. Assay specificity using inhibition experiments demonstrated specificities of 98%, 95%, 93%, 98%, 97%, 97%, and 98% for DT, TT, FHA, PRN, PT, Hib, and Hep-B, respectively. Spike recoveries of 80%-120% were demonstrated in different matrices, including those of hemolytic and lipemic sera samples. The precision and accuracy were confirmed by evaluating a panel of human serum samples obtained from vaccinated individuals. The assay demonstrated coefficients of variation (CV) of ≤ 20% across all assays, regardless of run, day, or analyst. This method demonstrated strong agreement with conventional commercially available assays, highlighting the advantages of multiplexing over traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.