Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666495›Full record

ArticleJuntendo medical journal2025

Adverse Effects of the Long-term use of an N95 Respirator in Healthcare Workers.

Hiroki Takami, Takashi Mitsuhashi, Daisuke Usuda, Tomohisa Nomura, Manabu Sugita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Juntendo medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hiroki Takami
Takashi Mitsuhashi
Daisuke Usuda
Tomohisa Nomura
Manabu Sugita

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Healthcare workers must take stringent infection control measures against coronavirus disease. Previous reports have indicated that N95 respirators cause fatigue, discomfort, and physical symptoms, such as headaches. We aimed to comparatively analyze the effect of the use of surgical and N95 respirators for long hours on the performance of healthcare workers. This is the first study to validate the effect of wearing N95 respirators on work efficiency. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted from April 2021 to October 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. Healthy healthcare workers at an emergency department were subjected to a performance task program comprising four tasks conducted before and after wearing a surgical mask/N95 respirator for at least 4 h, and the results were compared. Results: The study included 17 (male, 8 [47.1%]) healthcare workers. The age ranged from 22 to 32 (mean, 26.6) years. For each task, the rate of change in the percentage of correct responses, rate of decline in reaction time, and rate of decline in reaction time for correct responses were calculated before and after wearing the two types of masks. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of decline in reaction time between the masks for all tasks. However, there was a trend toward a high rate of decline in the alphanumeric detection task. Conclusions: Using an N95 respirator for 4 h continuously did not adversely affect work efficiency. Although prolonged work under conditions of discomfort should be avoided, it is unlikely that N95 respirators will adversely affect the performance of healthcare workers.

Indexed as

adverse effectsCOVID-19healthcare workerN95 respiratorwork efficiency

Identifiers

PMID40666495
PMCPMC12257224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.