Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666440›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Religiosity of adults on the autism spectrum: a cognitive and empirical analysis.

Agnieszka Ewa Burnos, Gabriela Kopacz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agnieszka Ewa BurnosFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Gabriela KopaczFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a narrative theoretical and empirical review of religiosity in adults on the autism spectrum. Religiosity is defined as an individual set of beliefs and practices proposed by a religious institution or group. This topic is critical for better understanding the religious and spiritual needs of autistic individuals, as well as the barriers they may face in developing and practicing religiosity. Theoretical accounts of the relationship between the social and cognitive characteristics of individuals on the autism spectrum and their religious attitudes and behaviors are examined. These include theory of mind, weak central coherence, executive function deficits, restricted interests, need for predictability, cognitive rigidity, and the broken mirror hypothesis. Alongside these conceptual frameworks, the article reviews findings from nine empirical studies. The emerging picture of religiosity among autistic adults is complex and marked by inconsistency. The central hypothesis-that impairments in mentalizing reduce religiosity-has not been unequivocally supported by empirical evidence. Similarly, results regarding the overall level of religiosity and representations of God in autistic versus neurotypical individuals are inconclusive. The article offers a synthetic overview of existing hypotheses and provides recommendations for the design of future research in this area.

Indexed as

autismautism spectrum disorderreligionreligiositytheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID40666440
PMCPMC12259667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.