Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666393›Full record

ReviewJournal of emergencies, trauma, and shock

Updated Review of Neurologic Concussion Biomarkers for Time-sensitive Point-of-care Testing.

Milin J Kurup, Amit Agrawal, Sarah R Temple, Sagar Galwankar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Milin J KurupOMS-II, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, AL, USA.
Amit AgrawalDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sarah R TempleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Sagar GalwankarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) continue to rise annually, scientists are continuing to improve point-of-care (POC) testing, involved in TBI diagnosis. TBIs, having various levels of severity, are often misdiagnosed or overlooked, especially in acute mild TBI or concussion scenarios. At the POC, currently, medical professionals utilize neuroimaging, cognitive scales, and biomarker assays to diagnose concussions and other forms of TBI. However, many of these parameters hinder diagnostic value due to accessibility and time-sensitive restraints. After analyzing the profuse research surrounding time sensitive concussion biomarkers kinetics, in the National Institute of Health National Library of Medicine database, this review aims to compile all published research on concussion POC biomarkers, screened between 2022 and 2023. Commonly studied concussion POC biomarkers include ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1, glial fibrillary acidic protein, visinin-like protein-1, S100 calcium-binding protein B, tau, and neurofilament light chain. Each neurologic biomarker has various implications and limitations when characterizing TBI. Novel biomarkers and multimodal paired concussion parameter models are continuously being evaluated for their respective diagnostic strengths and weaknesses.

Indexed as

Biomarkersconcussionsglial fibrillary acidic proteinmultimodal modelsneurofilament light chainpoint of carepoint-of-care testingS100 calcium-binding protein Btautraumatic brain injuriesubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1visinin-like protein-1

Identifiers

PMID40666393
PMCPMC12258534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.