ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Enhancing Pandemic Prediction: A Deep Learning Approach Using Transformer Neural Networks and Multi-Source Data Fusion for Infectious Disease Forecasting.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the urgent need for accurate prediction of pandemic trends. We propose a deep learning model for predicting Covid-19 cases and deaths at the county level through transformer neural networks with multi-source data fusion, incorporating historical case data, death data, and social media sentiment analysis to capture both temporal (historical trends) and spatial (geographical relationships) dynamics within time series data. Additionally, we develop multi-level and multi-scale attention mechanisms for adaptive time-frequency analysis. Across three Omicron variant waves (December 2021 through February 2023), the model demonstrated strong performance in predicting county-level Covid-19 cases and deaths, with median county agreement accuracy ranging from 74.0% to 82.6% for one-week case forecasts and 68.7% to 79.6% for 5-week case forecasts. Median county agreement accuracy for deaths ranged from 83.2% to 86.3% for one-week forecasts and 84.3% to 87.2% for five-week forecasts. Incorporating social media data yielded mild to moderate improvement in forecasting accuracy. Overall, the proposed model yielded substantial improvements compared to a baseline persistence model utilizing the last observation carried forward. By integrating real-time data and capturing complex pandemic dynamics, this approach surpasses traditional methods. Its high accuracy and generalizability make it a valuable tool for enhancing public health preparedness and response strategies in future outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.