ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Reduced Neural Speech Tracking in Adolescents with Listening Difficulty.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To investigate neural mechanisms underlying speech-in-speech listening in adolescents with listening difficulties (LiD). Methods: Neural speech tracking (NST) was assessed using magnetoencephalography (MEG) in 21 adolescents with LiD and 25 typically developing (TD) peers, all with audiometrically normal hearing. Participants performed a cocktail party task involving target speech presented alone or alongside competitor speech streams differing in talker identity and spatial location. NST was quantified using theta-band (4-8 Hz) inter-event phase coherence (IEPC) to acoustic edges. Results: Adolescents with LiD demonstrated significantly reduced NST of target speech relative to TD peers, whereas NST of competitor speech was comparable between groups. Theta-band IEPC correlated with caregiver-reported listening difficulties in both groups, indicating clinical relevance. The presence of both talker and spatial cues synergistically enhanced NST of target speech, an effect more pronounced in TD adolescents and absent for competitor streams. Conclusions: LiD is characterized by impairment in processing attended speech rather than enhanced competitor processing or generalized auditory disengagement. Reduced cue integration observed in adolescents with LiD may contribute to their listening challenges. Significance: These findings suggest targeted therapeutic interventions enhancing selective auditory attention and multimodal cue integration may effectively address listening difficulties in adolescents with LiD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.