ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025
RNA interference and turnover in plants -a complex partnership.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- An evolutionarily conserved N-terminal domain of RRF-3 governs GTSF-1 binding in nematodes.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Plant-derived, stress-responsive microRNA mimics reduce powdery mildew infections of barley.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Plant RNA interference from antiviral silencing to multiplex trait engineering for climate-resilient crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Epigenetic and Epitranscriptomic Antiviral Responses in Plants for Disease Management.Viruses · 2025Review
- Epigenetics in forest trees- key driver to phenotypic plasticity and adaptation under stress.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Regulation of Plant Genes with Exogenous RNAs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Agrochemical innovation for crop health: moving forward through dynamic disorder.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plants, often exposed to unfavorable external conditions and pathogen attacks, have developed a remarkably complex network of RNA interference (RNAi) pathways. This allows them to adapt gene expression to environmental cues and protects their genomes from invading nucleic acids. The process involves the production of small RNA molecules (sRNAs), which are crucial for ensuring the specificity of this mechanism and ultimately inhibiting the progression of viral infections or the movement of transposons within the genome. The generation of sRNAs is closely linked and balanced with mRNA turnover, as key stages of mRNA synthesis, such as 5'-capping, mRNA maturation, and transcription termination, affect sRNA generation and RNA silencing. Since there are many reviews available on sRNA biogenesis and function, we focused on summarizing the connections between RNA silencing and turnover, explaining how defective RNA maturation or degradation triggers RNA interference. Importantly, RNAi has gained attention as a promising strategy for developing innovative pest control techniques, leveraging this biological mechanism to protect crops. Nonetheless, how the expression of exogenous small RNAs in plants affects the relationship between small RNA and mRNA turnover, as well as how these RNAs are incorporated into specific RNAi pathways, remains uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.