ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Impacts of different types of straw returning on soil physicochemical properties, microbial community structure, and pepper quality.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Soil Microbial Diversity and Its Environmental Drivers in the Rhizosphere Profile ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Effects of straw return combined with different amendments on soil enzyme activities and bacterial community structure in acidic purple soil.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Spatial heterogeneity of plant diversity-productivity-carbon nexus in eastern Loess Plateau grasslands.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Straw returning serves as a critical agronomic practice for soil quality improvement and sustainable agricultural development. However, the differential regulatory mechanisms of cellulose-rich (e.g., pepper straw) versus lignin-rich (e.g., mulberry stem) straw types on soil physicochemical properties, microbial community structure, and crop nutritional quality remain poorly understood, particularly in pepper cultivation regions of Karst mountainous. Methods: In this study, taken the pepper planting soil as research object, the treatments of cellulose pepper straw (CS), lignin mulberry stem (MS) and control (CK) were set up. By measuring soil nutrients, microbial community diversity and pepper nutritional quality indicators, combined with high-throughput sequencing technology, the ecological effects of different types of straw returning were systematically analyzed. Results and discussion: The results showed that CS treatment significantly increased nitrate nitrogen content and available potassium, but decreased organic matter content by 8% and microbial biomass nitrogen by 65.5%. MS treatment significantly increased soil organic matter and microbial biomass carbon, and promoted the increase of amino acid content by 59.6%. Microbial community analysis showed that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.