ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Intracorneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus: A Narrative Literature Review.
Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes and Complications After INTACS Implantation in Keratoconus: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Trends in the Management of Keratoconus in Australia.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Corneal Cross-Linking in Keratoconus: Comparative Analysis of Standard, Accelerated and Transepithelial Protocols.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical and Tomographic Outcomes of Long Arc-Length Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation in Central Keratoconus.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Keratoconus is a bilateral, non-inflammatory corneal ectasia characterized by progressive thinning and conical protrusion, leading to irregular astigmatism, usually in association with high myopia. Visual rehabilitation options include corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL), rigid gas permeable contact lenses, intracorneal ring segments (ICRS), phakic intraocular lenses, and corneal transplantation. ICRS are synthetic, biocompatible implants or allogenic corneal tissue, designed to reduce corneal curvature and optimize the refractive profiles. Initially used in 1978 to treat myopia, their role in keratoconus was established in 2000. This review explores ICRS types, surgical techniques, and emerging developments. Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed. A total of 117 peer-reviewed manuscripts, including review articles, randomized controlled trials, case series, and reports, were analysed. Reference lists of publications were also reviewed. Results: ICRS types include MyoRings, KeraRings, Ferrara Rings, and Intacs, each with unique design characteristics and implantation methods. Corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments represent the latest innovation in ICRS. Femtosecond laser-assisted tunnel creation offers improved control over stromal depth and uniformity, reducing complications compared to mechanical dissection. Studies indicate slight corneal stiffening post-ICRS implantation, with no significant changes in intraocular pressure. Topographic changes post-ICRS show significant corneal flattening and reduction in astigmatism. Complications include epithelial defects, segment migration, and keratitis, but long-term follow-up reveals low rates of serious adverse events. Conclusion: ICRS provide an effective option for enhancing vision in select keratoconus patients, ultimately lowering the chances of requiring a corneal transplant. They are of particular use in those intolerant to contact lenses and without central corneal scarring. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes. Combining ICRS with other procedures like CXL may enhance outcomes, though careful patient selection is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.