Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666265›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Case of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Presenting as Syncope and Neurologic Deficits Without Pain: Diagnostic Pitfalls and a Therapeutic Dilemma.

Umar Ismail

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Umar IsmailMedicine, NHS Wales, Wales, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a true medical emergency that classically presents with sudden severe tearing chest pain that may radiate to the back or with tearing abdominal pain. When it presents atypically without pain, diagnostic delays or misdiagnosis are common, often with devastating consequences. We report the case of a 59-year-old male with uncontrolled hypertension who first presented to an outside emergency department (ED) with multiple collapses and was discharged after assessment. He presented 48 hours later to our ED following collapse and loss of consciousness. The patient was in shock upon arrival. Transient right upper limb weakness and slurring of speech were noted on initial assessment. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with cardiogenic shock was suspected on the basis of electrocardiographic (ECG) changes and raised troponin, and ACS treatment was administered. However, bedside echocardiogram performed to assess left ventricular function as part of the ACS work-up suggested Stanford type A AAD, which was confirmed by computed tomogram (CT) of the aorta. Emergency surgical repair of the aorta was performed after transfer to a tertiary hospital, with good postoperative recovery. This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for aortic dissection in patients presenting with syncope and neurological deficits even in the absence of classical symptoms. Simulation training specifically tailored to scenarios of atypical presentations of AAD may be of benefit to emergency clinicians and help reduce the unacceptably high rate of misdiagnosis.

Indexed as

aadlactatepainless aortic dissectionshock’stanford type a acute aortic dissectionste-acsstroketype a aortic dissection

Identifiers

PMID40666265
PMCPMC12261810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.