Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666217›Full record

ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2025

Psychometric validation of the Specific Phobia Questionnaire in an Australian community sample.

Jane Mathews, Bethany M Wootton, Karen Moses

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jane MathewsSchool of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Bethany M WoottonDiscipline of Psychology, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9036-0699
Karen MosesSchool of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0968-5432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Specific Phobia Questionnaire (SPQ; Fairbrother & Antony, 2012) is a 43-item scale that measures fear and interference towards various specific phobias. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the SPQ in an Australian population. Method: The sample consisted of 287 participants, aged 18-76 ( Results: Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good fit of the multidimensional factor structure. The SPQ showed excellent internal consistency in total, fear items, interference items, and low to high internal consistency when classified into the five factors. The SPQ demonstrated adequate convergent and discriminant validity when correlated with the Specific Phobia Dimensional Scale and the Panic Disorder Severity Scale - Self Report, respectively. Conclusions: Overall, the SPQ is a valid and reliable measure to use in an Australian community population. Future research is considered.

Indexed as

Anxietyfearinterferencespecific phobiaSpecific Phobia Questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID40666217
PMCPMC12218438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.