Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666209›Full record

ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2025

Individual and organisational factors contributing to the mental health and suicide risk of current and ex-serving Navy Clearance Divers.

Grace Claringbold, Nicky Robinson, Arlene Walker, Loch Forsyth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grace ClaringboldSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8624-3999
Nicky RobinsonSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8197-0604
Arlene WalkerSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-9729
Loch ForsythSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5014-3371

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Military service is inherently stressful, and a high prevalence of mental ill-health and suicide is reported among the veteran community. The current study examined the experiences of Navy Clearance Divers and factors that may be related to their mental health and suicide risk. Method: Current and ex-serving Australian Clearance Divers ( Results: Fifty-five per cent of participants reported suffering a mental health issue, 40% had considered suicide, and 68% were concerned about another Clearance Diver's suicide risk. Transitioning out of active service presented practical, emotional, and social challenges. Qualitative analysis revealed four organisational factors (organisational culture, leadership, workplace support, and work environment) and five individual factors (attitudes to mental health treatment, experience of trauma, health and behaviour, emotional and social factors through transition, and experience of transition processes) that may be contributing to the poor mental health and high suicide risk. Conclusions: Several systemic organisational problems may be contributing to poor mental health and wellbeing within Australian Clearance Divers, and improvements to mental health support and the transition process are required. Defence leadership is committed to enacting systematic change.

Indexed as

military serviceOccupational mental healthoccupational stresssuicide

Identifiers

PMID40666209
PMCPMC12218571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.