Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666166›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in health services2025

Learning from the implementation of person-centred care: a meta-synthesis of research related to the Gothenburg framework.

Emma Forsgren, Caroline Feldthusen, Sara Wallström, Ida Björkman, Jana Bergholtz, Febe Friberg, Joakim Öhlén

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From safety to agency: experiences of self-admission among patients with diverse mental health needs.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma ForsgrenInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Caroline FeldthusenInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sara WallströmInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ida BjörkmanInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jana BergholtzInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Febe FribergFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Joakim ÖhlénInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: While research has shown promising effects of person-centred care (PCC) in a variety of settings, it remains to be systematically implemented in practice. Publications exist on conceptual frameworks for PCC implementation, as well as identified barriers and enablers, but a comprehensive overview of lessons learned from PCC implementation efforts is lacking. The aim of this study therefore is to synthesize research-based empirical knowledge on implementation of PCC using the theoretical foundation of the Gothenburg framework. Method: Interpretive meta-synthesis, using the theoretical framing of the Gothenburg framework for PCC, and implementation science in the context of healthcare services in Sweden. Results: The results illuminate that PCC implementation includes three interrelated categories of strategies, more precisely: strategies connected towards creating and safeguarding a person-centred work and care culture, strategies in connection to leaders and change agents, and strategies focused on learning activities and adaption to setting. An ideal of co-creation in partnership is prominent, and both top-down approaches (such as policy) as well as bottom-up approaches (activities/methodologies/tactics) created within services are at play. Implementation strategies are both deliberate and emergent during the implementation process. Discussion: The synthesis connects to available implementation research in that it highlights the importance of care culture, connected leadership at different levels, and learning activities. While patients and family carers are included as partners in intervention research, their role as leaders and actors for change in implementation efforts is not explicitly described. Conclusion: The combination of deliberate and emergent strategies, movements from top-down and bottom-up in combination with the ideal of co-creation at all levels demonstrates the complexities and iterative nature of PCC implementation. By illustrating this complexity and providing examples of handling practical issues, this study contributes to deeper insights on PCC implementation.

Indexed as

clinical practicehealthcare servicesimplementationliterature reviewmeta-synthesispatient-centered carepatient participationperson-centred care

Identifiers

PMID40666166
PMCPMC12259557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.