Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666156›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

Experiences and needs of family members of perinatal infant deaths: a meta-synthesis.

Nana Cui, Shasha Wu, Xiaoyun Wang, Lei Sheng

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nana CuiNeonatal Ward, Jining No.1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong, China.
Shasha WuNeonatal Ward, Jining No.1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong, China.
Xiaoyun WangNeonatal Ward, Jining No.1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong, China.
Lei ShengNursing Department, Jining No.1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This meta-review of qualitative studies aims to explore the experiences and needs of family members following perinatal infant deaths. Design: A qualitative meta-synthesis was conducted. Data sources: Four databases, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science, were searched from inception through November 2024. An initial search using the keywords "perinatal death", "family members", and "qualitative research" retrieved 496 articles. Based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 studies were selected for inclusion. Review methodology: The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist was used to assess the quality of included studies. Results: Ten studies from nine countries were analyzed, yielding five overarching themes: negative emotional reactions, searching for the cause of death, rebuilding of life, reconstruction of meaning, and need for support. Conclusion: Negative emotional responses are an inevitable and profound part of the bereavement process for families experiencing perinatal loss. Identifying the cause of death helps families understand their loss and reduces uncertainty and self-blame. Central to the grieving process is the reconstruction of emotional and psychological meaning, which involves redefining life's purpose and gradually restoring a sense of normalcy. However, many of these families' needs remain unmet. There is an urgent need for multidisciplinary strategies to provide comprehensive, tailored support.

Indexed as

BereavementFamilyPerinatal DeathFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornQualitative ResearchSocial Supportdeathsexperiences and needsfamily membersmeta-synthesisperinatal infant

Identifiers

PMID40666156
PMCPMC12261921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.