Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666140›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025

MRI Enhancement Patterns After Resection of Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: Comparing Retrosigmoid and Translabyrinthine Approaches.

Olivia La Monte, Joshua Lee, Peter R Dixon, Omid Moshtaghi, Douglas M Bennion, Marc Schwartz, Rick Friedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olivia La MonteDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Diego California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4802-2122
Joshua LeeDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Diego California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5528-5003
Peter R DixonDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Diego California USA.
Omid MoshtaghiDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Diego California USA.
Douglas M BennionDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Diego California USA.
Marc SchwartzDepartment of Neurological Surgery University of California San Diego California USA.
Rick FriedmanDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of California San Diego California USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: One theoretical disadvantage of the retrosigmoid approach is the inability to visualize tumor at the fundus of the internal auditory canal, potentially leading to a higher risk of residual tumor even when the surgeon reports a gross total resection. We sought to compare MRI enhancement patterns and their persistence following retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection. Methods: Adults aged ≥ 18 years old who underwent translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid approaches for resection of a sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) at a single tertiary care institution were eligible for inclusion in this cohort study. Patterns of enhancement on postoperative MRI, when present, were qualitatively described as linear or nodular. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for tumor size and resection extent. Results: After surgeon-reported gross total resection, linear enhancement was present in 24/141 (17.0%) and nodular enhancement in 2/141 (1.4%) cases. Both patterns showed high rates of spontaneous resolution, with 3/24 (12.5%) of linear enhancements persisting on ≥ 2 scans and no nodular enhancements (0/2) persisting. Among patients with less than gross total resection, when present, nodular enhancement was more likely to persist (3/5, 60.0%) than linear enhancement (3/8, 38.0%, Conclusions: Postoperative enhancement typically resolves after gross total resection, but when present, surgeon-reported resection extent is a key predictor of persistence. However, our findings suggest that in retrosigmoid cases-where limited visualization of the fundus may increase the risk of residual tumor-surgeon reports of gross total resection may be less reliable. Level of Evidence: IV.

Indexed as

enhancement patternsMRIvestibular schwannoma

Identifiers

PMID40666140
PMCPMC12260213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.