ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
A model to simulate human cardio-respiratory responses to different fluid resuscitation treatments after hemorrhagic injury.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A model to simulate cardio-respiratory responses to fentanyl analgesia after traumatic injury.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- A reinforcement learning algorithm to optimize resource utilization in combat casualty care.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A model to simulate human cardio-respiratory responses to ketamine analgesia.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- A model to simulate human cardio-respiratory responses to airway obstruction.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decision-support systems based on artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms can enhance the capability and capacity of medics to provide care for combat casualties during large-scale combat operations. The training and validation of such algorithms require large amounts of vital-sign data, which can be generated using computational models with the appropriate fidelity. Previously, we developed and validated a human cardio-respiratory (CR) model that captures the essential features of the cardiovascular and respiratory responses to hemorrhage and fluid resuscitation. Here, we extended the CR model by adding oxygen transport and fluid exchange between the capillaries and the interstitial space, which allowed us to represent the effect of different resuscitation fluid types, including saline, blood, and blood products, on vital signs and blood variables. We calibrated and validated the model using hemorrhagic-injury and resuscitation data from four experimental swine studies, involving six different types of resuscitation fluids. We captured the general trend of the experimental vital signs and blood variables with average root mean square errors of 6.91 mmHg for mean arterial pressure, 0.49 L/min for cardiac output, 0.72 g/dL for hemoglobin, and 0.70 mL/(kg·min) for delivered oxygen. In addition, model simulations showed that oxygen delivery increased during fluid resuscitation, regardless of the resuscitation fluid type. The extended CR model, with its ability to account for responses to the most widely used resuscitation fluids, will allow us to generate more realistic synthetic data of trauma casualties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.