ReviewFrontiers in genetics2025
Topologically associating domains of chromatin on single-cell Hi-C data: a survey of bioinformatic tools and applications in the light of artificial intelligence.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Shared M0 macrophage infiltration-related gene signatures in osteoarthritis and osteomyelitis by integrating bulk and single-cell RNA transcriptome.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Topologically associating domains (TADs) uncovered on bulk Hi-C data are regarded as fundamental building blocks of a three-dimensional genome, and they are believed to effectively participate in the regulatory programs of gene expression. The computational analysis of TADs on single-cell Hi-C (scHi-C) data in the era of single-cell transcriptomics has received continuous attention since it may provide information beyond that on bulk Hi-C data. Unfortunately, the contact matrix for a single cell is ultra-sparse due to the low sequencing depth. Coupled with noises, artifacts, and dropout events from experiments, as well as cell heterogeneity caused by the cell cycle and transcription status, the computational analysis of TAD structures at the single-cell level has encountered some challenges not encountered at the bulk level. Herein, conduct a survey of bioinformatic tools and applications for TAD structures at the single-cell level in the light of artificial intelligence, including imputation of scHi-C data, identification of TAD boundaries and hierarchy, and differential analysis of TAD structures. The categories, characteristics, and evolutions of the latest available methods are summarized, especially the artificial intelligence strategies involved in these issues. This is followed by a discussion on why deep neural networks are attractive when discovering complex patterns from scHi-C data with an enormous number of cells and how it promotes the computational analysis of TADs at the single-cell level. Furthermore, the challenges that may be encountered in the analysis are outlined, and an outlook on the emerging trends in the near future is presented cautiously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.