Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666035›Full record

ArticleSmall science2025

Recoil Cavity Formation and Collapse for Drop Impact on Sieves.

Chandantaru Dey Modak, Prosenjit Sen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chandantaru Dey ModakCentre for Nano Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560012 India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6829-9713
Prosenjit SenCentre for Nano Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560012 India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6519-1707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The principle underpinning most printing technologies rely on is the formation and subsequent collapse of cavities to generate high-speed jets or droplets. Traditional methods, such as the Worthington jet or bubble-based cavity, utilize the collapse mechanism to give rise to a high-speed liquid jet. In contrast to known cavity collapse processes, a distinct phenomenon occurring during droplet impact on a superhydrophobic sieve is reported. Herein, the collapse of the impact cavity causes an air jet to rise through the sieve pore to form a "recoil cavity." Subsequently, the recoil cavity collapses to eject a jet (droplets). The notable discovery is the emergence of the recoil cavity as a result of the impact cavity's collapse, which has been absent on any other surfaces. The present research explores the underlying mechanism and develops a model of the phenomenon. It is found that the process follows the principle of energy conservation, with a threshold energy flux ratio between impact and recoil driving the ejection of a single drop. These findings provide valuable insights for understanding drop impact printing techniques, which can be applied across various fields, including electronics, biology, and structural printing.

Indexed as

cavity collapsedroplet impactrecoil cavitysievesuperhydrophobic

Identifiers

PMID40666035
PMCPMC12257895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.