Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666009›Full record

ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2023

Comparing psychological distress in Australians before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jack W Klein, Garrett Tyler-Parker, Brock Bastian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jack W KleinMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1207-247X
Garrett Tyler-ParkerResearch School of Management, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2389-1996
Brock BastianMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4619-3322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine if psychological distress has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to identify predictors of distress. Method: Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) scores from nationally representative Australian samples before ( Results: The pandemic sample reported significantly higher distress than the pre-pandemic sample, especially among Melbourne residents, women, and younger and older Australians. Stress attributed to COVID-19, feeling the pandemic management is out of control, and an unwillingness to vaccinate were also predictive of psychological distress. Conclusions: Women, youth, and Melbourne residents were most vulnerable to the negative effects of COVID-19 on wellbeing, while feelings related to a loss of control, stress about the virus, and vaccine hesitancy may have also contributed to psychological distress.

Indexed as

COVID-19K10Kessler psychological distress scalelockdownpsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID40666009
PMCPMC12175680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.