Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40666000›Full record

ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2023

The mental health of fly-in fly-out workers before and during COVID-19: a comparison study.

Jessica M Gilbert, Laura S Fruhen, Cindy T Burton, Sharon K Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica M GilbertCentre for Transformative Work Design, Future of Work Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0458-1546
Laura S FruhenSchool of Psychological Science, Psychology at Work Lab, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9599-3468
Cindy T BurtonCentre for Transformative Work Design, Future of Work Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5811-2660
Sharon K ParkerCentre for Transformative Work Design, Future of Work Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0978-1873

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study gives an overview of the impact of FIFO work on workers' mental health before and during COVID-19, using three comparison samples as well as norm data. It provides a timely update on FIFO workers' mental health and how it has been impacted during COVID-19. Method: Comparisons are conducted with three participant samples, namely two FIFO worker samples (one before and one during the Covid pandemic) and a purposefully sampled benchmark sample, and Australian population norm data on mental health. Constructs included in surveys were psychological distress, burnout, suicide intention, as well as social, psychological, and emotional wellbeing. Results: FIFO workers were found to have worse mental health than the matched benchmark sample, and the Australian norm samples pre-COVID-19. Differences between FIFO workers and the matched benchmark sample persisted for psychological distress and burnout after controlling for demographic factors. Mental ill-health and poor well-being were higher during the COVID-19 pandemic than before. Conclusions: FIFO workers need to be considered an at-risk group for adverse mental health outcomes, and this is even more so the case during COVID-19. Findings are attributable to the experience of FIFO work as well as the demographic character of the workforce.

Indexed as

burnoutFIFOpsychological distressRemote workwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40666000
PMCPMC12175603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.