ArticleFrontiers in aging2025
Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for osteoporosis diagnosis by lumbosacral X-ray and radiomics.
Article in Frontiers in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- To evaluate the value of L1 cortical bone quantitative CT parameters in predicting osteoporosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a multi-dimensional health indicator-driven osteoporosis risk prediction model: a large-sample cross-sectional study based on two centers.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a clinical prediction model for the diagnosis of osteoporosis using lumbosacral X-ray images through radiomics analysis. Methods: A total of 272 patients who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and lumbosacral X-ray examinations were categorized into two groups: (1) the training set (n = 191) and (2) the validation set (n = 81). Radiomic features were extracted using 3D Slicer software, and radiomic scores were calculated using the least absolute contraction and selection operator logistic regression, facilitating the generation of radiomic features. Subsequently, a clinical model, in conjunction with the radiomic features, was employed to develop a column-line diagram for the clinical and imaging feature prediction model. Performance evaluations for various models were conducted, encompassing recognition ability, accuracy, and clinical value, with the aim of identifying and optimizing prediction models. Results: The 12 most optimal imaging features were identified. Upon comprehensive performance analysis across different models, the clinical and radiomics model emerged as the most effective. The training set and test set area under the curves (AUCs) were 0.818 and 0.740, respectively. Additionally, the model exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 81.6%, 80.6% and 77.5%, 73.2%, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, we developed a column-line diagram that integrates clinical and radiomics feature, presenting a novel screening tool for osteoporosis in primary hospitals. This tool aims to enhance the efficiency of osteoporosis diagnosis in primary hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.