Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665973›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025

Designing for dissemination through community advisory board engagement in an implementation mapping process: A case study.

Gabriella M McLoughlin, Yerusalem Yohannes, Molly Kerstetter, Omar Martinez, Alex Dopp, Jennifer O Fisher, Maura Kepper, Rachel G Tabak, Ross C Brownson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gabriella M McLoughlinTemple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7731-2382
Yerusalem YohannesTemple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Molly KerstetterTemple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Omar MartinezCollege of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Alex DoppRAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Jennifer O FisherTemple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Maura KepperPrevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Rachel G TabakPrevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ross C BrownsonPrevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

Using Implementation Mapping to Maximize Impact of School-Based Policies for Obesity PreventionK01HL166957 · NHLBI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Gabriella Mcloughlin · 2023 to 2026
$684k
Investigating Student-Level Outcomes of Equity-Focused Implementation Mapping in a Cluster Randomized Trial to enhance the impact of Universal School MealsR03HL178872 · NHLBI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI MCLOUGHLIN, GABRIELLA · 2025 to 2025
$238k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL166957NHLBI NIH HHS R03 HL178872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to document the development of a Community Advisory Board (CAB) to enhance equitable dissemination of research findings within an implementation mapping study to enhance equitable impact of Universal School Meals (USM) through the Designing for Dissemination and Sustainability (D4DS) process. Methods: The D4DS process comprises 7 key elements to facilitate meaningful dissemination. To accomplish Step 1: Identify Partners, the research team conducted snowball recruitment methods within the local Philadelphia community and with existing connections. To Empathize and Outline the Problem (Step 2) and Understand the Context (Step 3), an interest meeting was held followed by monthly meetings. Our team Confirmed and Co-designed the Product (Step 4) and Developed the Dissemination Plan (Step 5) through collaborative brainstorming sessions. Finally, we started the Iterative Evaluation (Step 6) and Plan for Sustainability (Step 7) by administering a baseline and follow-up survey measuring CAB members' perceived utility, effectiveness, and sustainability of the board. Results: The final CAB included 8 members. The co-created dissemination products and plan comprised a 2-page infographic, social media toolkits, and a webinar slide deck, which were disseminated locally by the research team via presentations, websites, and email communication, in spring 2024. Initial findings from baseline and follow-up surveys indicated that CAB members benefited from skill development, compensation, writing credit, and autonomy in dissemination designing. Conclusions: Sharing power and decision-making enhanced the capacity for local-level dissemination, which is much needed to advance the science of community partnerships.

Indexed as

community engagementdesigning for disseminationequityImplementation sciencesustainability

Identifiers

PMID40665973
PMCPMC12260986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.