SynthesisJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
Epidemiology of Antiretroviral Therapy Related Adverse Drug Reactions and its Predictors Among Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus/AIDS in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveAdverse drug reactions (ADRs) induce iatrogenic harm in antiretroviral therapy (ART) care continuum. However, there is a dearth of concrete evidence in a resource-limited setting. Thus, this study was designed to consolidate existing knowledge, thereby informing policy and clinical care to improve patient safety.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesPubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched.Eligibility criteriaEmploying the condition, context, and population framework, observational primary studies were included.Data extraction and synthesisIndependent reviewers undertook data extraction and synthesis. This meta-analysis employed the random-effects restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method, with its protocol preregistered on the International Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024546390).ResultsThe pooled prevalence of ADRs was 36.7% [95% CI: 26.6-46.9,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.