Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665640›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2025

Twenty-five year trend in antipsychotic medication prescribing in England: challenges and opportunities.

Hannah Newman, David Branford, Richard Laugharne, Richard Byng, Rohit Shankar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah NewmanPeninsula School of Medicine, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
David BranfordPeninsula School of Medicine, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Richard LaugharnePeninsula School of Medicine, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9916-343X
Richard ByngPeninsula School of Medicine, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-9467
Rohit ShankarPeninsula School of Medicine, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1183-6933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntipsychotics are primarily indicated for psychotic disorders. There is increasing concern regarding their potential overuse for other conditions.

aimsTo examine the change in the number of community prescriptions and corresponding costs for antipsychotics per head of population over 25 years (1998-2022) in England.

methodThe data for 1998-2022 were obtained from two separate resources from the OpenPrescribing database: from 1998 to 2016 from their long-term trends data-set; and for 2017-2022 from the monthly medication prescribing data. The relevant British National Formulary subcategories 4.2.1 'antipsychotic drugs' and 4.2.2 'antipsychotic depot injections' were selected. The annual differences in prescriptions and the mean average annual increase were calculated. Scatter plots to visualise the yearly trend and Spearman testing to assess the strength of the correlations were done. The total annual costs of these medications were calculated for this time period.

resultsThe annual mean increase in the number of prescriptions was 287 548 in raw numbers and 4.27 per 1000 population. There is a statistically significant and strong positive relationship between time and the prescriptions of antipsychotics per 1000 population (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.995,

conclusionsThis analysis suggests a worrying increasing trend in antipsychotic medication prescribing. Potential causal factors include off-licence use. Clinical practice and research implications are discussed.

Indexed as

Antipsychoticcommunityprescribingprimary carepsychotic disorders

Identifiers

PMID40665640
PMCPMC12303834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.