Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665568›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology & psychotherapy

When Adverse Experiences Influence the Interpretation of Ourselves, Others and the World: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Maladaptive Schemas in Victims of Violence.

Allison Uvelli, Marta Floridi, Giuseppe Agrusti, Anna Chiara Franquillo, Lucia Fiumalbi, Tommaso Micheloni, Andreina Arcuri, Stefania Iazzetta, Andrea Gragnani

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Allison UvelliDepartment of Medical Science, Surgery, and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-3133
Marta FloridiDepartment of Medical Science, Surgery, and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Giuseppe AgrustiSchool of Cognitive Psychotherapy (SPC), Grosseto, Italy.
Anna Chiara FranquilloSchool of Cognitive Psychotherapy (SPC), Grosseto, Italy.
Lucia FiumalbiSchool of Cognitive Psychotherapy (SPC), Grosseto, Italy.
Tommaso MicheloniSchool of Cognitive Psychotherapy (SPC), Grosseto, Italy.
Andreina ArcuriSchool of Cognitive Psychotherapy (SPC), Grosseto, Italy.
Stefania IazzettaSchool of Cognitive Psychotherapy (SPC), Grosseto, Italy.
Andrea GragnaniSchool of Cognitive Psychotherapy (SPC), Grosseto, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9129-8794

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly maladaptive schemas (EMS) are dysfunctional emotional and cognitive patterns formed in childhood due to negative experiences that hinder basic psychological needs. These schemas shape beliefs about oneself, others and the world, influencing relationships and overall functioning. This study aims to identify common EMS among victims of violence and their associations with specific types of abuse, offering insight into underlying beliefs that may contribute to repeated victimization.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of observational studies published between May and January 2025, analysing data from online databases. Studies included survivors aged 14 to 60, assessed with the Young Schema Questionnaire. Meta-analyses with random-effects models calculated mean effect sizes and correlation coefficients, while meta-regressions examined the influence of age, gender and country.

resultsA total of 20 studies were included. Survivors exhibited various EMS, including self-sacrifice, unrelenting standards, abuse, abandonment, dependence and vulnerability to harm. Psychological abuse was strongly linked to emotional deprivation, abuse, social isolation, failure, abandonment, emotional inhibition, vulnerability to harm, defectiveness, dependence and subjugation. Survivors of physical abuse frequently displayed emotional deprivation, social isolation and vulnerability to harm. Among survivors of intimate partner violence, the most prevalent schemas were subjugation, emotional deprivation, abuse and social isolation. Meta-regressions indicated that age, gender and country influenced certain EMS.

conclusionsIdentifying maladaptive schemas enhances our understanding of survivors' dysfunctional beliefs, which is essential for developing more effective, individualized interventions and preventive strategies.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCrime VictimsViolenceAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicYoung Adultadverse experiencesbeliefsearly maladaptive schemassystematic review and meta‐analysisviolence

Identifiers

PMID40665568
PMCPMC12264405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.