Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665561›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Fine-tuning open-source large language models to improve their performance on radiation oncology tasks: A feasibility study to investigate their potential clinical applications in radiation oncology.

Peilong Wang, Zhengliang Liu, Yiwei Li, Jason Holmes, Peng Shu, Lian Zhang, Xiang Li, Quanzheng Li, Brady S Laughlin, Diego Santos Toesca and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI in Proton Therapy Treatment Planning: A Narrative Review.International journal of particle therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Peilong WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Zhengliang LiuSchool of Computing, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Yiwei LiSchool of Computing, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Jason HolmesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Peng ShuSchool of Computing, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Lian ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Xiang LiDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Quanzheng LiDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brady S LaughlinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Diego Santos ToescaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Carlos E VargasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Sujay A VoraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Samir H PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Terence T SioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Tianming LiuSchool of Computing, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Wei LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Funding

Dose Linear Energy Transfer Volume Histogram and Dosimetric Seed Spot Analysis in Spot Scanning Proton TherapyR01CA280134 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Wei Liu · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
4D Robust Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Proton TherapyK25CA168984 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LIU, WEI · 2012 to 2015
$450k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA168984NCI NIH HHS R01 CA280134NCI NIH HHS R01CA280134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe radiation oncology clinical practice involves many steps relying on the dynamic interplay of abundant text data. Large language models have displayed remarkable capabilities in processing complex text information. But their direct applications in specific fields like radiation oncology remain underexplored. PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate whether fine-tuning LLMs with domain knowledge can improve the performance on Task (1) treatment regimen generation, Task (2) treatment modality selection (photon, proton, electron, or brachytherapy), and Task (3) ICD-10 code prediction in radiation oncology.

methodsData for 15 724 patient cases were extracted. Cases where patients had a single diagnostic record, and a clearly identifiable primary treatment plan were selected for preprocessing and manual annotation to have 7903 cases of the patient diagnosis, treatment plan, treatment modality, and ICD-10 code. Each case was used to construct a pair consisting of patient diagnostics details and an answer (treatment regimen, treatment modality, or ICD-10 code, respectively) for the supervised fine-tuning of these three tasks. Open source LLaMA2-7B and Mistral-7B models were utilized for the fine-tuning with the Low-Rank Approximations method. Accuracy and ROUGE-1 score were reported for the fine-tuned models and original models. Clinical evaluation was performed on Task (1) by radiation oncologists, while precision, recall, and F-1 score were evaluated for Task (2) and (3). One-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to statistically analyze the results.

resultsFine-tuned LLMs outperformed original LLMs across all tasks with p value ≤ 0.001. Clinical evaluation demonstrated that over 60% of the fine-tuned LLMs-generated treatment regimens were clinically acceptable. Precision, recall, and F1-score showed improved performance of fine-tuned LLMs.

conclusionFine-tuned LLMs demonstrated statistically significant improvements over original LLMs upon three clinically important tasks in radiation oncology. This study explored the feasibility of applying fine-tuned LLMs in radiation oncology, inspiring further development of utilizing LLMs to assist with radiation oncology tasks.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingRadiation OncologyFeasibility StudiesHumansLarge Language Modelsclinical tasksfine‐tuninglarge language modelsradiation oncology

Identifiers

PMID40665561
PMCPMC12694766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.