ArticleMedical physics2025
Fine-tuning open-source large language models to improve their performance on radiation oncology tasks: A feasibility study to investigate their potential clinical applications in radiation oncology.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI in Proton Therapy Treatment Planning: A Narrative Review.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Article
- The daily dose: Early usability of an LLM tool for patient summaries and trial matching in radiation oncology.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- AI-assisted software development for brachytherapy seed inventory management.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Augmenting patient safety surveillance in radiation oncology with large language model-based root cause analysis: A proof-of-concept study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Automated Review of Patient Records: Privacy-Preserving Large Language Models for Identifying Incident Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy at Scale.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Generative AI, foundation models and large language models in radiation therapy physics: Clinical applications, challenges, and future directions.Medical physics · 2026Review
- Article
- Trustworthy artificial intelligence in radiation oncology: cross-industry lessons for development, validation, and deployment.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Parameter efficient fine-tunning of foundation model to facilitate tumor response prediction for ovarian cancer patients.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe radiation oncology clinical practice involves many steps relying on the dynamic interplay of abundant text data. Large language models have displayed remarkable capabilities in processing complex text information. But their direct applications in specific fields like radiation oncology remain underexplored. PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate whether fine-tuning LLMs with domain knowledge can improve the performance on Task (1) treatment regimen generation, Task (2) treatment modality selection (photon, proton, electron, or brachytherapy), and Task (3) ICD-10 code prediction in radiation oncology.
methodsData for 15 724 patient cases were extracted. Cases where patients had a single diagnostic record, and a clearly identifiable primary treatment plan were selected for preprocessing and manual annotation to have 7903 cases of the patient diagnosis, treatment plan, treatment modality, and ICD-10 code. Each case was used to construct a pair consisting of patient diagnostics details and an answer (treatment regimen, treatment modality, or ICD-10 code, respectively) for the supervised fine-tuning of these three tasks. Open source LLaMA2-7B and Mistral-7B models were utilized for the fine-tuning with the Low-Rank Approximations method. Accuracy and ROUGE-1 score were reported for the fine-tuned models and original models. Clinical evaluation was performed on Task (1) by radiation oncologists, while precision, recall, and F-1 score were evaluated for Task (2) and (3). One-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to statistically analyze the results.
resultsFine-tuned LLMs outperformed original LLMs across all tasks with p value ≤ 0.001. Clinical evaluation demonstrated that over 60% of the fine-tuned LLMs-generated treatment regimens were clinically acceptable. Precision, recall, and F1-score showed improved performance of fine-tuned LLMs.
conclusionFine-tuned LLMs demonstrated statistically significant improvements over original LLMs upon three clinically important tasks in radiation oncology. This study explored the feasibility of applying fine-tuned LLMs in radiation oncology, inspiring further development of utilizing LLMs to assist with radiation oncology tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.