Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665548›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Radiotherapeutic efficacy of gold nanoparticles for high dose-rate brachytherapy compared to conventional radiotherapy: An in vitro study.

Daniel Cecchi, Nolan Jackson, Mehran Goharian, Wayne Beckham, Devika Chithrani

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel CecchiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Nolan JacksonDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Mehran GoharianDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Wayne BeckhamDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Devika ChithraniDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

OLFACTORY RECEPTORSF32DC000190 · NIDCD · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ZHANG, YINONG · 1995 to 1998
–
CIHR DC0190GPDiscovery Grant (DG) RGPIN-2017-04501NanoMedicines Innovation NetworkNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC000190Strategic Initiative 2021-RES-SI-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiation therapy is a pivotal part of the treatment plan for many cancer patients. Effective dose escalation in the tumour is required to achieve optimal curative results but is hindered by normal tissue toxicity. Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) as radiosensitizers to improve the radiation cross-section of malignant tissue is one avenue currently being explored to improve therapeutic results. It is hypothesized that at lower incident photon energies, dose enhancement from GNPs should be significantly greater compared to high-energy irradiations due to a greater photoelectric cross-section. PURPOSE: To assess GNP radiosensitization in vitro during low-energy, high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) irradiations and compare to the measured radiosensitization from a 6MV photon beam from a clinical linear accelerator (LINAC).

methodsA novel Solid Water Phantom was developed for uniform irradiations from a common HDR-BT source (192-Ir) and verified using EBT-4 radiochromic film. HeLa (cervical) and PC3 (prostate) monolayer cell cultures were used to represent common HDR-BT treatment sites. The cells were dosed at 10 µg/mL concentration with functionalized 12 nm spherical GNPs. GNP uptake in the cellular membrane was quantified using live-cell imaging and a trace element analysis technique. Cell cultures with or without GNPs were irradiated from the 192-Ir source or clinical 6 MV photon beam from a LINAC to a 200 cGy dose prescription. Cellular viability was measured using a clonogenic assay and DNA double-strand break (DSB) assay.

resultsEndocytosis of spherical GNPs was confirmed 24 h post-incubation, resulting in an average of 8.7 × 10

conclusionsOur results suggest GNP incorporation into HDR-BT is a viable and effective treatment strategy. As our dosing concentration in this study induced no measurable cellular toxicity, this strategy has the potential to be implemented in clinical scenarios. Ultimately, we believe that incorporating GNPs into radiotherapy workflows can increase radiotherapeutic efficacy, improving the quality of life for cancer patients.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyGoldMetal NanoparticlesRadiation DosageCell SurvivalHeLa CellsHumansPC-3 CellsPhantoms, ImagingRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsRadiotherapy DosageGoldRadiation-Sensitizing Agentsbrachytherapycancernanoparticleradiosensitizerradiotherapytherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID40665548
PMCPMC12264320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.