ArticleMedical physics2025
An open-source deep learning framework for respiratory motion monitoring and volumetric imaging during radiation therapy.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomimetic Phantoms in X-Ray-Based Radiotherapy Research: A Narrative Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An open-source deep learning framework for respiratory motion monitoring and volumetric imaging during radiation therapy.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReal-time image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) was first clinically implemented more than 25 years ago but is yet to find widespread adoption. Existing approaches to real-time IGRT require dedicated or specialized equipment that is not available in most treatment centers and most techniques focus exclusively on targets without tracking the surrounding organs-at-risk (OARs). PURPOSE: To address the need for inexpensive real-time IGRT, we developed Voxelmap, a deep learning framework that achieves 3D respiratory motion estimation and volumetric imaging using the data and resources already available in standard clinical settings. This framework can also be adapted to other imaging modalities such as MRI-Linacs. In contrast with existing approaches, which constrain the solution space with linear priors, Voxelmap encourages diffeomorphic mappings that are topology-preserving and invertible.
methodsDeformable image registration and forward-projection or slice extraction were used to generate patient-specific training datasets of 3D deformation vector fields (DVFs) and 2D images (or k-space data) from pretreatment 4D-CT or 4D-MRI scans. The XCAT and CoMBAT digital phantoms and SPARE Grand Challenge Dataset provided synthetic and patient data, respectively. Five network architectures were used to predict 3D DVFs from 2D imaging data. Networks A-C were trained on x-ray images, Network D was trained on MR images and Network E was trained on k-space data. Using Voxelmap, network-generated 3D DVFs were used to warp both structures contoured on the peak-exhale pretreatment image and the image itself to enable simultaneous target and OAR tracking and volumetric imaging. Using the standard-of-care approach, contours were expanded to internal target volumes.
resultsValidating on digital phantom data for x-ray guided treatments of cardiac arrhythmia, mean Dice similarity between predicted and ground-truth target and OAR contours for Networks A-C ranged from 0.81 ± 0.05 to 0.82 ± 0.05 and 0.78 ± 0.04 to 0.81 ± 0.04, respectively, while target centroid error ranged from 2.0 ± 0.5 to 2.3 ± 0.9 mm. For MRI-based digital phantom data, mean Dice similarity for target and OAR contours was 0.91 ± 0.06 and 0.90 ± 0.02 for both Networks D and E, while target centroid error ranged from 1.7 ± 0.8 to 1.8 ± 0.8 mm. For x-ray-based lung cancer patient data, mean Dice similarity for target and OAR contours for Networks A-C ranged from 0.86 ± 0.05 to 0.89 ± 0.04 and 0.94 ± 0.01 to 0.97 ± 0.01, respectively. However, in terms of target centroid error, only Network A outperformed an ITV-based approach at 1.8 ± 0.7 mm while Networks B and C exhibited large errors of 2.7 ± 1.2 to 3.5 ± 1.4 mm, respectively. Target volumes dynamically shifted using Voxelmap were 31 % smaller than the standard-of-care.
conclusionsVoxelmap provides a generalized, open-source tool for intrafraction respiratory motion monitoring and volumetric imaging. Comparing tracking errors across synthetic and patient data revealed that certain network architectures are more robust to the scatter and noise profiles encountered in typical clinical settings. These learnings will inform future developments in real-time motion tracking. Our code is available at https://github.com/Image-X-Institute/Voxelmap .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.