ArticleGenome medicine2025
Utilizing genomics to identify novel immunotherapeutic targets in multiple myeloma high-risk subgroups.
Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating the Therapeutic Landscape of Multiple Myeloma: Immunotherapy, Microenvironment, and Resistance.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Elevated desmoglein-2 expression in multiple myeloma is a prognostic marker across genomic subtypes with impact on high-risk cytogenetics and a distinct gene expression profile.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- RNA-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Multiple Myeloma: From Molecular Targets to Delivery and Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmunotherapy is now standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM), where the most common targets are B cell maturation antigen, CD38, and G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D). However, additional novel targets are needed to counter tumor heterogeneity, therefore new strategies to identify additional targets are also required.
methodsWe utilized multi-omics data from two large datasets A framework that utilized prior knowledge of cell surface potential, expression in healthy organs, and expression level in MM cells was established to define novel immunotherapeutic targets. High confidence targets were prioritized for myeloma populations and subgroups, validated with flow cytometry and immunoblotting.
resultsNovel population-level candidate targets such as ITGA4 and LAX1, as well as subtype-specific targets including ROBO3 in t(4;14), CD109 in t(14;16), CD20 in t(11;14), CD180 in hyperdiploidy, GPRC5D in 1q gain, and ADAM28 in biallelic TP53 samples were identified. Candidate target surface expression was validated by flow cytometry and CRISPR-Cas9 knock-out models. Sub-clonal differences in expression were noted, using single-cell RNA-seq data. Additionally, alternative splicing of existing immunotherapy targets, such as FCRL5, was noted as a potential mechanism of antigen loss.
conclusionsOur study presents a methodology to identify novel candidate immunotherapy targets. We also use known genomic data to identify subtype-specific targets that could be used either as complementary or alternative targets to existing treatments. We show that immunotherapy targets can have heterogenous expression within a patient, which can affect treatment efficacy. Taken together, our study establishes a robust methodology to identify novel therapeutic targets in MM, revealing critical insights that will inform the development of current and next-generation immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.