Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665393›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2025

Utilizing genomics to identify novel immunotherapeutic targets in multiple myeloma high-risk subgroups.

Enze Liu, Oumaima Jaouadi, Riya Sharma, Nathan Becker, Travis S Johnson, Parvathi Sudha, Vivek S Chopra, Faiza Zafar, Habib Hamidi, Charlotte Pawlyn and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Enze LiuMelvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Oumaima JaouadiMelvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Riya SharmaMelvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Nathan BeckerMyeloma Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Travis S JohnsonDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Sciences, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Parvathi SudhaMelvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Vivek S ChopraGenentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Faiza ZafarGenentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Habib HamidiGenentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Charlotte PawlynInstitute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, London, UK.
Attaya SuvannasankhaMelvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Rafat AbonourMelvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Brian A WalkerMelvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. brianwalker@miami.edu.

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis ProgramP30CA082709 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI David W Clapp · 1999 to 2026
$59.3M
Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University CA082709NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunotherapy is now standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM), where the most common targets are B cell maturation antigen, CD38, and G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D). However, additional novel targets are needed to counter tumor heterogeneity, therefore new strategies to identify additional targets are also required.

methodsWe utilized multi-omics data from two large datasets A framework that utilized prior knowledge of cell surface potential, expression in healthy organs, and expression level in MM cells was established to define novel immunotherapeutic targets. High confidence targets were prioritized for myeloma populations and subgroups, validated with flow cytometry and immunoblotting.

resultsNovel population-level candidate targets such as ITGA4 and LAX1, as well as subtype-specific targets including ROBO3 in t(4;14), CD109 in t(14;16), CD20 in t(11;14), CD180 in hyperdiploidy, GPRC5D in 1q gain, and ADAM28 in biallelic TP53 samples were identified. Candidate target surface expression was validated by flow cytometry and CRISPR-Cas9 knock-out models. Sub-clonal differences in expression were noted, using single-cell RNA-seq data. Additionally, alternative splicing of existing immunotherapy targets, such as FCRL5, was noted as a potential mechanism of antigen loss.

conclusionsOur study presents a methodology to identify novel candidate immunotherapy targets. We also use known genomic data to identify subtype-specific targets that could be used either as complementary or alternative targets to existing treatments. We show that immunotherapy targets can have heterogenous expression within a patient, which can affect treatment efficacy. Taken together, our study establishes a robust methodology to identify novel therapeutic targets in MM, revealing critical insights that will inform the development of current and next-generation immunotherapies.

Indexed as

GenomicsImmunotherapyMultiple MyelomaHumans

Identifiers

PMID40665393
PMCPMC12261794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.