Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665390›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2025

Improved epigenetic age prediction models by combining sex chromosome and autosomal markers.

Zhong Wan, Peter Henneman, Huub C J Hoefsloot, Ate D Kloosterman, Pernette J Verschure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhong WanMolecular and Cellular Epigenetics, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Room C2.106, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter HennemanDepartment of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Huub C J HoefslootBiosystems Data Analysis, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ate D KloostermanMolecular and Cellular Epigenetics, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Room C2.106, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pernette J VerschureMolecular and Cellular Epigenetics, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Room C2.106, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.j.verschure@uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2922-4836

Funding

Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement 642691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlterations in epigenetic DNA methylation (DNAm) can be used as an accurate and robust method for biological age prediction. We assessed the feasibility of incorporating sex chromosomal DNAm markers into a six autosomal DNAm CpG marker-based age prediction model, since DNAm-based prediction modeling has predominantly relied on analyzing DNAm patterns on autosomes.

resultsWe employed random forest regression (RFR) to construct age prediction models with publicly available DNAm Infinium 450 K microarray data of sex chromosomes from human whole blood and buffy coat samples and assessed the RFR model performance based on the root-mean squared error (RMSE) and the mean absolute deviation (MAD) of cross-validation. Four types of models were constructed consisting of DNAm probes on sex chromosomes only, on sex chromosomes and autosomes together, on sex chromosomes and/or autosomes with additional stratification by sex and/or age restriction, and reduced models comprising the top best performing sex chromosomal probes combined with six best performing autosomal probes from a previous study. Our data indicated no added predictive value of Y chromosomal DNAm markers in our best-performing prediction model, even though we acknowledged the potential of applying Y chromosomal markers for age prediction. Yet, a significantly improved accuracy of age prediction was observed using a restricted set of X chromosomal combined with the six best predicting autosomal DNAm probes. In this reduced model we noted an RMSE and MAD of 2.54 and 1.89 years, respectively. Particularly, four DNAm markers on the X chromosome exhibited a strong correlation with age, i.e., cg27064949 (DGAT2L6), cg04532200 (PLXNB3), cg01882566 (RPGR) and cg25140188 (annotated to an intergenic region).

conclusionsOur findings illustrate that an age prediction model built with a set of sex chromosomal markers combined with autosomal age-informative markers, may serve as a high accuracy model to predict chronological age and may be even competitive with commonly used model built with autosomal DNAm markers only. This study represents a step forward towards the application of epigenetic autosomal and sex chromosomal combined age prediction models for aging and forensic research. Highlights A set of age-prediction models based on DNA methylation (DNAm) markers on sex chromosomes and autosomes was constructed using random forest regression (RFR). From the total dataset containing 1291 whole blood and 547 buffy coat blood samples, 860 whole blood samples were used as training set and 481 as test set, while 365 buffy coat datasets were used as training set and 182 as test set. Cross-validation of the constructed RFR models using more than 10,000 X and 30 Y chromosomal DNAm markers from all collected blood samples, provided a root-mean squared error (RMSE) ranging from 7.70 to 14.29 years, and a mean absolute deviation (MAD) from 6.10 to 11.13 years. Models constructed using sex-stratified and age-restricted data subsets demonstrated comparable RMSE and MAD values to models constructed without stratification or restriction. Models constructed using a selected set of 37 X chromosomal and six autosomal DNAm markers exhibited a significantly improved age prediction performance with a minimum RMSE of 2.54 years and MAD of 1.89 years. A total of four X chromosomal DNAm markers were found to exhibit a significant correlation with age as indicated by a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.50. In our data sets, Y chromosomal DNAm markers did not enhance predictive performance of our best-performing age prediction model, even though we acknowledge their recognized potential for age prediction accuracy.

Indexed as

AgingDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticModels, GeneticSex ChromosomesAdolescentAdultAgedChromosomes, Human, XChromosomes, Human, YCpG IslandsFemaleGenetic MarkersHumansMaleMiddle AgedGenetic MarkersAge predictionDNA methylationEpigeneticsRandom forest regressionSex chromosome

Identifiers

PMID40665390
PMCPMC12261677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.