Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665321›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

The benefits and boundaries of psychological safety in simulation-based education: an integrative review.

Anine Madsgaard, Alette Svellingen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anine MadsgaardVID Specialized University, Bergen, Norway. anine.madsgaard@vid.no.
Alette SvellingenVID Specialized University, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological safety has been highlighted as essential for student learning in simulation-based education (SBE). The pedagogical literature emphasizes that such learning situations must challenge learners and make them experience that something is at stake. Therefore, this study aimed to analyse how psychological safety in SBE is assured in recent research.

methodsThe study employed an integrative review method. Databases were systematically searched for articles, and 2071 records were screened, of which 13 studies met the inclusion criteria.

findingsThe findings of the study resulted in two themes related to psychological safety in SBE. Theme 1 demonstrates that psychological safety is warranted because simulation is an unsafe learning environment, while theme 2 illustrates that psychological safety is implemented to optimise students' learning during SBE.

conclusionThis study reveals that establishing psychological safety in SBE is crucial due to the potential for students to feel anxious and stressed. Psychological safety in SBE is more nuanced than in traditional work environments in which the concept originated and is not merely about eliminating all discomfort during learning situations. Additionally, psychological safety is necessary for a challenging learning environment in which students feel safe enough to risk failure and be exposed to dilemmas, thereby facilitating learning opportunities. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Active learningExperiential learningSimulation-based learningTeaching

Identifiers

PMID40665321
PMCPMC12261705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.