Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665296›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Being a professional nurse until retirement - a qualitative interview study in Germany.

Lisa Schmedding, Theresa A Forbrig, Johannes Gräske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa SchmeddingAlice Salomon University of Applied Sciences, Alice Salomon Platz 5, 12628, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5723-8579
Theresa A ForbrigAlice Salomon University of Applied Sciences, Alice Salomon Platz 5, 12628, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4765-5691
Johannes GräskeAlice Salomon University of Applied Sciences, Alice Salomon Platz 5, 12628, Berlin, Germany. graeske@ash-berlin.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4128-6474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses are crucial to the global healthcare system, yet there is a growing shortage, exacerbated by demographic shifts and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The International Council of Nurses projects a deficit of 13 million nurses worldwide in the near future, contributing to missed nursing care and jeopardizing patient safety. Although extensive research has explored reasons why nurses leave the profession, far less is known about the factors that support their long-term commitment and retention until retirement. Hence, study aimed to identify the factors contributing to long-term retention of nurses in the profession, particularly those who stay until retirement.

methodsThis qualitative study used semi-structured expert interviews with 22 nurses in Germany who had at least 30 years of work experience, aiming to explore the personal, organizational, and societal factors that have supported their continued engagement in the profession. A purposive sampling method was used to select participants from various care settings, including acute, long-term, and outpatient care. Data were audio- and video-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content-structuring qualitative content analysis. Thematic categories were developed using a structured content analysis approach following Kuckartz, supported by both deductive and inductive coding via the MAXQDA software to identify key themes related to job retention.

resultsThe analysis revealed three overarching thematic categories: personal resources and motivations, organizational context and working conditions, and recognition and social value. The first category includes factors such as career choice motives, personal values, and generation-specific influences, all of which are significant contributors to long-term career commitment. The category organizational context and working conditions, including job satisfaction, work-time control, role clarity, and coping strategies, plays a pivotal role in retaining nurses. The third category encompassed the perceived value of nursing work in society, appreciation from patients and peers, and the professional identity fostered by meaningful recognition. DISCUSSION: This study provides valuable insights into the factors that contribute to nurses' decisions to stay in the profession until retirement. While many studies emphasize the challenges and negative aspects of nursing that lead to attrition, this research highlights the positive factors that promote job retention. Addressing these factors, such as improving working conditions, ensuring adequate recognition, and supporting personal values and career motivations, could enhance nurse retention strategies. These findings underscore the importance of retention-focused strategies that enhance meaning in work, professional identity, and workplace culture-shifting the policy lens from attrition prevention to long-term engagement. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Job satisfactionNurse’s rolePersonnel retentionProfessional autonomyQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40665296
PMCPMC12265344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.