ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Prediction of suicidal attempts among Chinese adolescents with mood disorders: a clinical study using a machine learning approach.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Playground to Psychiatry: Examining the Predictive Validity of Childhood Behavioral Assessments for Adult Mental Health Outcomes.Child psychiatry and human development · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning (ML) has been widely used to predict suicidal attempts (SA) in adolescents and adults. However, there is a need for studies of accurate and efficient SA models specifically for use in adolescents with mood disorders due to a lack of existing research integrating risk variables when predicting clinical SA. As such, this study aimed to explore the potential of ML models to predict SA among adolescents with mood disorders.
methodsStudy participants were 134 Chinese adolescents with mood disorders (20.1% boys, Mage = 15.26, SD = 1.67) and their treating physicians. Of these adolescents, 53 had clinically documented SA. Four ML models – logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), eXtreme gradient boosting machine (XGBM), and light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) were used to predict SA in participants, and their results were compared to identify key predictive variables as well as the best-performing model. Class imbalance was handled via Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique applied only to each training fold, and every model was tuned and evaluated with stratified 10-fold cross-validation.
resultsThe LGBM model achieved the highest discriminant performance, with an AUC of 0.79 and an accuracy of 0.75, with factors of the emotional expression functioning of non-suicidal self-injury, suicidal planning, peer relationship issues, physician-assessed depression levels, and patient self-reported anxiety and depression levels all demonstrating the highest values in predicting SA.
conclusionThe findings of this study indicate that the LGBM model, which uses adolescents’ clinical characteristics and experiences, was the most effective in estimating SA in adolescents with mood disorders. Future research should validate this model further in other populations, as well as assess its utility in selecting suicide prevention interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.