Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665284›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances the efficacy of wearable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for mild knee osteoarthritis in the middle-aged person: a randomized controlled trial.

Chun-Ya Xia, Hao-Zhi Niu, Xin-Wen Zhang, Si-Yan Cai, Ying-Jie Fan, Tian-Pei Xie, Peng-Xia Dong, Xiao-Tong Zu, Ze-Lin Su, Xing-Sheng Lu and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Individualized Physical Therapy on Pain and Function in Individuals With Chronic Knee Pain: A Pilot Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chun-Ya Xia *Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University), Suzhou, China.
Hao-Zhi Niu *Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University), Suzhou, China.
Xin-Wen Zhang *Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University), Suzhou, China.
Si-Yan CaiDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University), Suzhou, China.
Ying-Jie FanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University), Suzhou, China.
Tian-Pei XieDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University), Suzhou, China.
Peng-Xia DongDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University), Suzhou, China.
Xiao-Tong ZuDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University), Suzhou, China.
Ze-Lin SuDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University), Suzhou, China.
Xing-Sheng Lu *School of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. luxingsheng88@sina.com.
Yong-Gang Hao *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. hyg3625@126.com.
Min Su *Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University), Suzhou, China. sumin@suda.edu.cn.

Funding

Horizontal project of Soochow University in 2020 No.H201173National key Research and Development Program of China No.2022YFC2009700Undergraduate Training Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Soochow University No.202210285188Y
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of wearable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the middle-aged person with mild knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

designDouble-blind, randomized clinical trial.

settingA general hospital. SUBJECTS: Participants aged 60-70 with mild KOA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1-2).

interventionsThe experimental group received TENS + tDCS, and the control group received TENS + sham tDCS for four weeks from Monday through Friday. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The secondary outcomes included participants' Visual Analog Scale (VAS), step length, cadence, 6-minute walking test (6MWT), active knee range of motion (ROM), and quadriceps strength. The indexes were assessed one week before treatment (T0), two weeks after treatment commencement (T1), four weeks after treatment commencement (T2), one month after treatment cessation (T3), and two months after treatment cessation (T4).

resultsA total of 110 participants (55 per group) completed the intervention and follow-up. Repeated-measures ANOVA indicated that tDCS significantly improved the efficacy of TENS in alleviating pain and enhancing walking ability among patients with mild KOA. Statistically significant differences in BPI scores were observed between the experimental and control groups at T1 (2.16 vs. 2.45, P = 0.038), T2 (1.17 vs. 1.73, P < 0.001), and T3 (2.17 vs. 2.41, P = 0.021). However, no significant difference was detected at T4 (2.50 vs. 2.63, P = 0.293).

conclusionThe four-week combined intervention demonstrated that tDCS potentiated the therapeutic efficacy of TENS in managing mild KOA. The combined protocol exhibited superiority over TENS monotherapy, with sustained benefits observed up to one-month post-intervention.

trial registrationThis research has been registered in chictr.org.cn (registration number: ChiCTR2200064735) on 15 October 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=182561 .

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationWearable Electronic DevicesAgedCombined Modality TherapyDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeChronic painKnee osteoarthritisPhysical therapyRehabilitationTranscranial direct current stimulationTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40665284
PMCPMC12261559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.