Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665242›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Non-invasive liver fibrosis screening on CT images using radiomics.

Jay J Yoo, Khashayar Namdar, Sean Carey, Sandra E Fischer, Chris McIntosh, Farzad Khalvati, Patrik Rogalla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jay J YooInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Khashayar NamdarInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Sean CareyJoint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2N2, Canada.
Sandra E FischerLaboratory Medicine & Pathobiology - Anatomic Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2N2, Canada.
Chris McIntoshVector Institute, 661 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada.
Farzad KhalvatiInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada. farzad.khalvati@utoronto.ca.
Patrik RogallaJoint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2N2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a radiomics machine learning model for detecting liver fibrosis on CT images of the liver.

methodsWith Ethics Board approval, 169 patients (68 women, 101 men; mean age, 51.2 years ± 14.7 [SD]) underwent an ultrasound-guided liver biopsy with simultaneous CT acquisitions without and following intravenous contrast material administration. Radiomic features were extracted from two regions of interest (ROIs) on the CT images, one placed at the biopsy site and another distant from the biopsy site. A development cohort, which was split further into training and validation cohorts across 100 trials, was used to determine the optimal combinations of contrast, normalization, machine learning model, and radiomic features for liver fibrosis detection based on their Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) on the validation cohort. The optimal combinations were then used to develop one final liver fibrosis model which was evaluated on a test cohort.

resultsWhen averaging the AUC across all combinations, non-contrast enhanced (NC) CT (AUC, 0.6100; 95% CI: 0.5897, 0.6303) outperformed contrast-enhanced CT (AUC, 0.5680; 95% CI: 0.5471, 0.5890). The most effective model was found to be a logistic regression model with input features of maximum, energy, kurtosis, skewness, and small area high gray level emphasis extracted from non-contrast enhanced NC CT normalized using Gamma correction with γ = 1.5 (AUC, 0.7833; 95% CI: 0.7821, 0.7845).

conclusionsThe presented radiomics-based logistic regression model holds promise as a non-invasive detection tool for subclinical, asymptomatic liver fibrosis. The model may serve as an opportunistic liver fibrosis screening tool when operated in the background during routine CT examinations covering liver parenchyma. The final liver fibrosis detection model is made publicly available at: https://github.com/IMICSLab/RadiomicsLiverFibrosisDetection .

Indexed as

Liver CirrhosisMachine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyLiverMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiomicsROC CurveContrast MediaComputed tomographyFibrosisLiverMachine learningRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID40665242
PMCPMC12265201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.