ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Ultrafast T2-weighted MR imaging of the urinary bladder using deep learning-accelerated HASTE at 3 Tesla.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning reconstruction versus conventional parallel imaging for sagittal T2-weighted MRI in cervical cancer: a comparison of acceleration factors.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis prospective study aimed to assess the feasibility of a half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo sequence (HASTE) with deep learning (DL) reconstruction for ultrafast imaging of the bladder with reduced susceptibility to motion artifacts.
methods50 patients underwent pelvic T2w imaging at 3 Tesla using the following MR sequences in sagittal orientation without antiperistaltic premedication: T2-TSE (time of acquisition [TA]: 2.03-4.00 min), standard HASTE (TA: 0.65-1.10 min), and DL-HASTE (TA: 0.25-0.47 min), with a slice thickness of 3 mm and a varying number of slices (25-45). Three radiologists evaluated the image quality of the three sequences quantitatively and qualitatively.
resultsOverall image quality of DL-HASTE (average score: 5) was superior to HASTE and T2-TSE (p < .001). DL-HASTE provided the clearest bladder wall delineation, especially in the apical part of the bladder (p < .001). SNR (36.3 ± 6.3) and CNR (50.3 ± 19.7) were the highest on DL-HASTE, followed by T2-TSE (33.1 ± 6.3 and 44.3 ± 21.0, respectively; p < .05) and HASTE (21.7 ± 5.4 and 35.8 ± 17.5, respectively; p < .01). A limitation of DL-HASTE and HASTE was the susceptibility to urine flow artifact within the bladder, which was absent or only minimal on T2-TSE. Diagnostic confidence in assessment of the bladder was highest with the combination of DL-HASTE and T2-TSE (p < .05).
conclusionDL-HASTE allows for ultrafast imaging of the bladder with high image quality and is a promising addition to T2-TSE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.