Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665209›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

A data-driven approach to forest health assessment through multivariate analysis and machine learning techniques.

Raja Waqar Ahmed Khan, Hamayun Shaheen, Muhammad Ejaz Ul Islam Dar, Tariq Habib, Muhammad Manzoor, Syed Waseem Gillani, Abeer Al-Andal, John Oluwafemi Ayoola, Muhammad Waheed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raja Waqar Ahmed KhanDepartment of Botany, The University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, Pakistan.
Hamayun ShaheenDepartment of Botany, The University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ejaz Ul Islam DarDepartment of Botany, The University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, Pakistan.
Tariq HabibDepartment of Botany, The University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad ManzoorDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Syed Waseem GillaniDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Abeer Al-AndalDepartment of Biology, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha, 61413, Saudi Arabia.
John Oluwafemi AyoolaDepartment of Forest Resources Management, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, P.M.B. 4000, Nigeria. joayoola68@lautech.edu.ng.
Muhammad WaheedDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Life Science, University of Okara, Okara, 56130, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHimalayan forests are fragile, rich in biodiversity, and face increasing threats from anthropogenic pressures and climate change. Assessing their health is critical for sustainable forest management. This study integrated ecological indicators (tree density, size, regeneration, deforestation, slope, grazing, and erosion) with machine learning (ML) to classify forest health and identify key drivers across 37 Western Himalayan sites. Principal component analysis (PCA) reduced data dimensionality, highlighting major ecological gradients. K-means clustering was used to group forests into three distinct classes based on ecological characteristics, due to its efficiency in identifying natural patterns within multivariate data. ML models, including Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were trained and validated using an 80:20 train-test split and 5-fold cross-validation.

resultsPCA revealed that elevation, disturbance, and regeneration explained 74.3% variance. Forest health varied across sites, with 10 categorized as healthy, 19 as moderate, and 8 as unhealthy. Forest regeneration was highly skewed (2.67) and leptokurtic (9.8), with few sites showing high seedling abundance, while deforestation (mean = 294 stumps ha

conclusionsThis study highlights ML-driven classification as a precise, scalable, and objective tool for large-scale forest health assessments. Conservation efforts should prioritize degraded forests through afforestation, slope stabilization, controlled grazing, erosion management, and continuous ecosystem monitoring. Future studies should integrate high-resolution remote sensing (e.g., Landsat, Sentinel-2) and climate datasets (e.g., temperature, precipitation, and drought indices) to enhance predictive capabilities and support long-term forest management planning. The findings underscore the value of data-driven approaches, establishing machine learning as an effective tool to enhance forest monitoring and support evidence-based forest conservation and management in the Himalayas.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesForestsMachine LearningTreesMultivariate AnalysisPrincipal Component AnalysisBiodiversity monitoringDeforestationEcological indicatorsHimalayasSustainable management

Identifiers

PMID40665209
PMCPMC12261679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.