ArticleBMC plant biology2025
A data-driven approach to forest health assessment through multivariate analysis and machine learning techniques.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming thyroid disease education: AI and virtual technologies in residency training.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Lightweight Multimodal Fusion for Urban Tree Health and Ecosystem Services.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHimalayan forests are fragile, rich in biodiversity, and face increasing threats from anthropogenic pressures and climate change. Assessing their health is critical for sustainable forest management. This study integrated ecological indicators (tree density, size, regeneration, deforestation, slope, grazing, and erosion) with machine learning (ML) to classify forest health and identify key drivers across 37 Western Himalayan sites. Principal component analysis (PCA) reduced data dimensionality, highlighting major ecological gradients. K-means clustering was used to group forests into three distinct classes based on ecological characteristics, due to its efficiency in identifying natural patterns within multivariate data. ML models, including Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were trained and validated using an 80:20 train-test split and 5-fold cross-validation.
resultsPCA revealed that elevation, disturbance, and regeneration explained 74.3% variance. Forest health varied across sites, with 10 categorized as healthy, 19 as moderate, and 8 as unhealthy. Forest regeneration was highly skewed (2.67) and leptokurtic (9.8), with few sites showing high seedling abundance, while deforestation (mean = 294 stumps ha
conclusionsThis study highlights ML-driven classification as a precise, scalable, and objective tool for large-scale forest health assessments. Conservation efforts should prioritize degraded forests through afforestation, slope stabilization, controlled grazing, erosion management, and continuous ecosystem monitoring. Future studies should integrate high-resolution remote sensing (e.g., Landsat, Sentinel-2) and climate datasets (e.g., temperature, precipitation, and drought indices) to enhance predictive capabilities and support long-term forest management planning. The findings underscore the value of data-driven approaches, establishing machine learning as an effective tool to enhance forest monitoring and support evidence-based forest conservation and management in the Himalayas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.