ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2025
Canadians' perceptions about heart donation after death by circulatory criteria: a mixed methods study.
Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Canadians' perceptions about heart donation after death by circulatory criteria: a mixed methods study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCardiac donation after death determination by circulatory criteria (DCC) can be performed using either direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) or normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). If broadly implemented in Canada, these procedures have the potential to reduce the cardiac transplant wait list. We aimed to evaluate the perspectives of Canadians on cardiac DCC.
methodsWe performed a convergent design mixed methods study involving 21 focus groups and surveys of 109 adults in Canada on the topic of cardiac DCC.
resultsWe found that participants were broadly supportive of both cardiac DCC protocols. Principle concerns about DPP included relatively impaired heart quality, while concerns about NRP included the perception that the procedure may be invasive and may not be acceptable to other Canadians, including donor families. Participants who self-identified as second-generation immigrants were concerned about potential lack of support for cardiac DCC, especially NRP, by other Canadians. Participants suggested strategies to increase support for organ donation and cardiac DCC specifically, including mass media campaigns, educational initiatives, encouraging the public to discuss end-of-life wishes with family members, and enlisting primary care providers and community leaders to advance public knowledge and support.
conclusionsIn this mixed methods study of people living in Canada, we found broad support for cardiac DCC. Concerns were primarily related to heart quality in DPP and perceived invasiveness of NRP. Participants identified mass media campaigns, educational material, and engagement of primary care providers and community leaders as strategies to garner support for cardiac DCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40665183What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.