ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[CAR T cell therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia].
Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancements in diagnosis and treatments of acute leukemia.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern immunotherapy in the form of T‑cell-based CD19-targeted approaches, such as the approved bispecific T‑cell engager (BiTE antibody) blinatumomab and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells) with the approved products tisagenlecleucel and brexucabtagene autoleucel has revolutionized the treatment of B‑precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The pivotal clinical trials for the approval, including follow-up studies as well as the now available real-world data outside of these trials, showed that CAR-T cell therapy provides an effective treatment option for patients with relapsed and refractory B‑precursor ALL after chemotherapy, improving an otherwise poor prognosis. In addition to the therapeutic response, side effects of CAR-T cell therapy and their clinical management are discussed. Furthermore, resistance mechanisms are discussed and an outlook on further development is given. The T‑precursor ALL remains a challenge due to its immunological complexity but new developments in CAR-T cell treatment approaches targeting CD5 and CD7 show that progress is also being made in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40665156What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.