ArticleScientific reports2025
Study on the gas outflow pattern and outflow prediction model of the return mining face under complex geological conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abnormal gas emissions at the mining face under intricate geological conditions pose significant challenges to coal mine safety and operational efficiency. To explore the impact of fault structures on gas migration in mining areas, a two-dimensional geological framework incorporating fault features was established using COMSOL Multiphysics software. Simulations were conducted to analyze gas movement at different proximities to the fault, identifying key factors that affect gas dispersion in mining environments with complex geological characteristics. A predictive model was subsequently developed by integrating fault-induced gas migration effects. The findings reveal that as the mining face advances to nearly 100 m from the fault, the surrounding stress intensifies to about 21 MPa, creating a pronounced stress concentration. At a distance of approximately 50 m from the fault, the stress concentration becomes even more severe than at 100 m, with stress levels reaching nearly 39 MPa, approximately double that at 100 m. Additionally, within the initial 10 m of the mining face, a region of high gas concentration is observed. At 50 m from the fault, gas pressure is about 20% higher than at 100 m, while gas migration velocity is approximately 2.4 times greater. As the coal seam near the fault exhibits increased gas occurrence, the coal structure becomes more fractured with proximity to the fault, further intensifying gas outflow at the mining face. A comparative assessment of the KPCA-WOA-BP neural network model against the BP, ACO-BP, and FA-BP models demonstrated their respective average relative errors as 22.46%, 9.66%, 5.64%, and 2.84%. The proposed model exhibited superior predictive accuracy and computational efficiency, making it a reliable tool for forecasting gas emissions at the mining face under complex geological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.