ArticleScientific reports2025
The accuracy of a new noninvasive approach using physical examination combined with ultrasonography to detect intraabdominal hypertension.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microwave Radar Sensing for Non-Invasive Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: A Simulation-Based Analysis with Phantom Testing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Variation and accuracy of intra-abdominal pressure measurement in different body positions: a prospective study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is common in critically ill patients and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. While intravesical manometry is the gold standard for measuring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), its applicability may be limited in some clinical settings. This study evaluated the accuracy of a noninvasive bedside method combining physical examination and ultrasonography to assess the ratio of the maximal anteroposterior to transverse abdominal diameter (AP-T ratio) for detecting IAH. This cross-sectional diagnostic study was conducted in the surgical ICU of a tertiary care hospital. Intravesical pressure was measured as the reference standard. The AP-T ratio was assessed at the L2 level by two blinded investigators. Among 67 patients, 18 were diagnosed with IAH. The AP-T ratio showed a strong correlation with IAP (r = 0.70, P < 0.001). An AP-T ratio ≥ 0.56 demonstrated 83% sensitivity, 84% specificity, and an AUROC of 0.84 for detecting IAH. After adjusting for BMI, the association remained significant. Diagnostic performance was highest in patients with normal BMI. The AP-T ratio was predominantly influenced by the anteroposterior diameter. This simple, noninvasive technique may serve as a practical alternative when standard IAP measurements are not feasible. Further validation in patients with severe IAH or abdominal compartment syndrome is warranted.Thai Clinical Trials Registry reference number TCTR20220831002.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.