ArticleScientific reports2025
Adaptive conflict resolution for IoT transactions: A reinforcement learning-based hybrid validation protocol.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel Reinforcement Learning-Based Hybrid Validation Protocol (RL-CC) that revolutionizes conflict resolution for time-sensitive IoT transactions through adaptive edge-cloud coordination. Efficient transaction management in sensor-based systems is crucial for maintaining data integrity and ensuring timely execution within the constraints of temporal validity. Our key innovation lies in dynamically learning optimal scheduling policies that minimize transaction aborts while maximizing throughput under varying workload conditions. The protocol consists of two validation phases: an edge validation phase, where transactions undergo preliminary conflict detection and prioritization based on their temporal constraints, and a cloud validation phase, where a final conflict resolution mechanism ensures transactional correctness on a global scale. The RL-based mechanism continuously adapts decision-making by learning from system states, prioritizing transactions, and dynamically resolving conflicts using a reward function that accounts for key performance parameters, including the number of conflicting transactions, cost of aborting transactions, temporal validity constraints, and system resource utilization. Experimental results demonstrate that our RL-CC protocol achieves a 90% reduction in transaction abort rates (5% vs. 45% for 2PL), 3x higher throughput (300 TPS vs. 100 TPS), and 70% lower latency compared to traditional concurrency control methods. The proposed RL-CC protocol significantly reduces transaction abort rates, enhances concurrency management, and improves the efficiency of sensor data processing by ensuring that transactions are executed within their temporal validity window. The results suggest that the RL-based approach offers a scalable and adaptive solution for sensor-based applications requiring high-concurrency transaction processing, such as Internet of Things (IoT) networks, real-time monitoring systems, and cyber-physical infrastructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.