Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40665124›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Adaptive conflict resolution for IoT transactions: A reinforcement learning-based hybrid validation protocol.

Mohammad A Al Khaldy, Ahmad Nabot, Ahmad Al-Qerem, Issam Jebreen, Abdulbasit A Darem, Asma A Alhashmi, Mohammad Alauthman, Amjad Aldweesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammad A Al KhaldyBusiness Intelligence & Data Analytics, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan.
Ahmad NabotDepartment of Software Engineering, Al Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Ahmad Al-QeremFaculty of Information Technology, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Issam JebreenFaculty of Information Technology, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan.
Abdulbasit A DaremCenter for Scientific Research and Entrepreneurship, Northern Border University, Arar, 73213, Saudi Arabia.
Asma A AlhashmiComputer Science Department, College of Sciences, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad AlauthmanDepartment of Information Security, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan.
Amjad AldweeshCollege of Computing and Information Technology, Shaqra University, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia. a.aldweesh@su.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel Reinforcement Learning-Based Hybrid Validation Protocol (RL-CC) that revolutionizes conflict resolution for time-sensitive IoT transactions through adaptive edge-cloud coordination. Efficient transaction management in sensor-based systems is crucial for maintaining data integrity and ensuring timely execution within the constraints of temporal validity. Our key innovation lies in dynamically learning optimal scheduling policies that minimize transaction aborts while maximizing throughput under varying workload conditions. The protocol consists of two validation phases: an edge validation phase, where transactions undergo preliminary conflict detection and prioritization based on their temporal constraints, and a cloud validation phase, where a final conflict resolution mechanism ensures transactional correctness on a global scale. The RL-based mechanism continuously adapts decision-making by learning from system states, prioritizing transactions, and dynamically resolving conflicts using a reward function that accounts for key performance parameters, including the number of conflicting transactions, cost of aborting transactions, temporal validity constraints, and system resource utilization. Experimental results demonstrate that our RL-CC protocol achieves a 90% reduction in transaction abort rates (5% vs. 45% for 2PL), 3x higher throughput (300 TPS vs. 100 TPS), and 70% lower latency compared to traditional concurrency control methods. The proposed RL-CC protocol significantly reduces transaction abort rates, enhances concurrency management, and improves the efficiency of sensor data processing by ensuring that transactions are executed within their temporal validity window. The results suggest that the RL-based approach offers a scalable and adaptive solution for sensor-based applications requiring high-concurrency transaction processing, such as Internet of Things (IoT) networks, real-time monitoring systems, and cyber-physical infrastructures.

Indexed as

Concurrency ControlConflict ResolutionEdge ComputingHigh-Concurrency SystemsHybrid Edge–Cloud ValidationInternet of ThingsIoT TransactionsReal-Time DatabasesReinforcement LearningTemporal Validity

Identifiers

PMID40665124
PMCPMC12263858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.