ArticleScientific reports2025
An efficient deep learning based approach for automated identification of cervical vertebrae fracture as a clinical support aid.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Through Detail: Radiomics and Windowing Techniques as Key for Detecting Dens Axis Fractures in CT Scans.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Intelligence Architectures and Machine Learning Applications in Contemporary Spine Care.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The evolution of cervical spine trauma classification: a paradigm shift from morphological description to clinical decision-making.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical vertebrae fractures pose a significant risk to a patient's health. The accurate diagnosis and prompt treatment need to be provided for effective treatment. Moreover, the automated analysis of the cervical vertebrae fracture is of utmost important, as deep learning models have been widely used and play significant role in identification and classification. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid transfer learning approach for the identification and classification of fractures in axial CT scan slices of the cervical spine. We utilize the publicly available RSNA (Radiological Society of North America) dataset of annotated cervical vertebrae fractures for our experiments. The CT scan slices undergo preprocessing and analysis to extract features, employing four distinct pre-trained transfer learning models to detect abnormalities in the cervical vertebrae. The top-performing model, Inception-ResNet-v2, is combined with the upsampling component of U-Net to form a hybrid architecture. The hybrid model demonstrates superior performance over traditional deep learning models, achieving an overall accuracy of 98.44% on 2,984 test CT scan slices, which represents a 3.62% improvement over the 95% accuracy of predictions made by radiologists. This study advances clinical decision support systems, equipping medical professionals with a powerful tool for timely intervention and accurate diagnosis of cervical vertebrae fractures, thereby enhancing patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.