ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of the relationship between sagittal skeletal discrepancies and maxillary sinus volume in adults using cone-beam computed tomography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Skeletal Class II malocclusion is associated with a more distant maxillary first molar-sinus adjacency: a retrospective CBCT study in adults.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- CraniofacialMorphometric Associations with Frontal Sinus Hypoplasia/Aplasia in Adults: Orbital and Upper Facial Differences on CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Exploring root-sinus proximity across varying degrees of transverse maxillary constriction in adolescent patients.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Lateral Cephalometric Radiography: Principles, Common Positioning Errors, and AI-Driven Quality Control.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Endoscopic Management of a Right Maxillary Sinus Mucocele With Palatal and Medial Wall Erosion.Cureus · 2026Article
- Synergistic Triad of Mixed Reality, 3D Printing, and Navigation in Complex Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pharyngeal Airway Changes After Functional Orthodontic Treatment in Growing Class II Patients: A Retrospective Cephalometric Comparison of Twin Block, RPE and AMCOPLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Cross-Sectional Radiological and Reconstructive Anatomy of the Paranasal Sinuses in Normal Mesaticephalic Dogs.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging to assess maxillary sinus volume and related measurements in different sagittal skeletal classes. Sixty CBCT images of adult patients aged between 18 and 25 years were collected and divided into three groups based on the ANB angle value: Class I (ANB = 0-4 degrees), Class II (ANB > 4 degrees), and Class III (ANB < 0 degrees). Maxillary sinus volume, surface area, width, depth, and height measurements were performed using Mimics Research TM software version 21.0. The maxillary sinus measurements were compared among the three skeletal groups. A total of 60 patients, with a mean age of 21.10 ± 2.00 years (ranging from 18 to 25 years), met the inclusion criteria. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in maxillary sinus measurements between the right and left sides (P > 0.05). Therefore, the mean value of bilateral measurements was used for subsequent analysis. No significant differences were observed in maxillary sinus volume, surface area, or height among the three skeletal classes (P > 0.05). However, the Class I group exhibited significantly greater maxillary sinus width and depth compared to Class III (P < 0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.